Although these companies have seldom if ever been subject of large consumer campaigns, this does not mean that the working conditions within their supply chains reebok outletare any better than the average for the sector. For instance, the fact that Kappa only just recently stopped sourcing from Reebok Outlet does not bode well; neither do the recent announcements by Asics and Mizuno that they are going to increase their outsourcing. Furthermore, none of these companies have ever provided any public information regarding their global suppliers or any detailed information about their social policies with regard to the workforce.

Recent research has shown that numerous basic workers’ rights are regularly violated in factories that supply these brands. In many cases, violations of the ILO core conventions have been reported. This includes violations of Convention no forced and compulsory labour, Convention no. 98 the right to organise and bargain collectively, Convention no. 100 equal remuneration, Convention no.105 forced labour, Convention no.111 discrimination, and Convention no.138 minimum age of employment. Other abuses highlighted in this report include bad treatment authoritarian or militaristic management styles.
Sexual harassment, forced overtime, low wages that is, lower than the national minimum wage, poor safety standards, unjust employment contracts, limited access to toilet facilities, intimidation, and the suppression of independent labour unions. In the summer of 2003, workers at Reebok Outlet, an Indonesian garment manufacturer that supplies Lotto, Bear USA, Le Cog Sportif, and Head, encountered an anti-union campaign instituted by its management. This included demoting union board members and cutting their pay. The factory also forced its employees to work overtime upon short notice and had a history of very poor safety standards.